Saturday, April 27, 2024
 Popular · Latest · Hot · Upcoming
4
rated 0 times [  4] [ 0]  / answers: 1 / hits: 894  / 3 Years ago, tue, may 18, 2021, 2:57:52

I work at a webdevelopment company and we're all getting new PC's. Our plan is to run a dual-boot system with Ubuntu and Windows 7 or 8.



I've setup a few of these systems so I know the how of it, installing Windows first, shrinking the partition etc.



What I can't seem to find, despite reading many topics about the subject, is a way to determine the ideal partition layout.



At home I have a 320gb disk divided roughly in 200gb for Win, 10gb swap, and the rest for Ubuntu itself. I've seen no need to make a shared partition for both systems so I just gave both more then enough to work on their own.



At work we've only got a 128gb SSD to work with and we absolutely need some kind of shared space since we'll be running both windows and ubuntu for developing and testing sites and apps.



Now I know Ubuntu kan run find on less than 20gb, less than 10gb even.
The system will have 16GB of ram, so I suppose the swap partition should be about the same size for hibernation purposes, probably somewhat smaller.



Windows is a disk hogger usually, but I can set most of the paths to the remaining partitions so that would help a lot. Would 20gb suffice in that case ?



So that would leave me with 20gb Ubuntu, 16gb swap, 20gb Win and about 72gb for shared storage.



But I'm not sure if this is the best division. I would probably need to install most of the windows applications on the 72gb partition. Perhaps even the larger Ubuntu apps, not sure.



And what format would I use for the 72gb ? I suppose NTFS since that's fastest for windows and ubuntu can work with it. Are there any performance issues for Ubuntu in this case ?



I'd love to hear your thoughts about this.



Thanks in advance


More From » dual-boot

 Answers
2

If this is part of a wide-ranging update, perhaps a centralised file server with some redundancy might be in order. There are many systems and protocols that work for both Windows and Linux and will provide next-to-native performance (if not better).



That would leave all important stuff off the SSDs and free for applications and swap. It's more costly (probably the cost of a few computers on its own) but it offers clear benefits:




  • File collaboration between many people,

  • Adding external network access (if desirable), and

  • Backing things up is now much, much easier.


[#29711] Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 3 Years  [reply] [flag answer]
Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
ofunn

Total Points: 164
Total Questions: 116
Total Answers: 116

Location: Liberia
Member since Fri, Oct 22, 2021
3 Years ago
;