Sunday, April 28, 2024
 Popular · Latest · Hot · Upcoming
2
rated 0 times [  2] [ 0]  / answers: 1 / hits: 1500  / 1 Year ago, fri, february 17, 2023, 8:16:46

My computer at home is a bit lacking, so I want to make sure I'm getting the most out of it while I can. Generally speaking, here are the specs:




  • 4GB Memory

  • AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+ × 2

  • 64-bit Ubuntu



The terminal shows me the following:



me@home:~$ uname -a
Linux home 3.0.0-17-generic #30-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 8 20:45:39 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

me@home:~$ lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV380 [Radeon X600 (PCIE)]

me@home:~$ sudo lshw -C video
*-display:0
description: VGA compatible controller
product: RV380 [Radeon X600 (PCIE)]
vendor: ATI Technologies Inc
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: 00
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm pciexpress msi vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=radeon latency=0
resources: irq:44 memory:e0000000-efffffff ioport:ac00(size=256) memory:fdef0000-fdefffff memory:fdec0000-fdedffff
*-display:1 UNCLAIMED
description: Display controller
product: RV380 [Radeon X600]
vendor: ATI Technologies Inc
physical id: 0.1
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.1
version: 00
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm pciexpress bus_master cap_list
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:fdee0000-fdeeffff

me@home:~$ lspci -nn | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc RV380 [Radeon X600 (PCIE)] [1002:5b62]


The additional drivers menu in System Settings shows me nothing useful and my attempt at installing ATI's Catalyst Control center (drivers that came with the video card) failed. I believe the latest version of Ubuntu at the time was 9.x.



What should I do? Install an old version of Ubuntu 9? Use some alternative driver?



UPDATE: I might try my hand at a bit from this answer next: "Installing Catalyst Manually (from AMD/ATI's site)" . From a terminal, fgl_glxgears returns the following:



fgl_glxgears: command not found


UPDATE: Per @William's question, here is some additional output:



me@home:~$ sudo apt-get install fglrx
[sudo] password for blong:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
libkrb5-3:i386 libk5crypto3:i386 liblcms1:i386 libcupsimage2:i386
libidn11:i386 xserver-xorg-video-r128-dbg libgnutls26:i386 libtasn1-3:i386
libfreetype6:i386 libavahi-common-data:i386 libcups2:i386
libkrb5support0:i386 libgcrypt11:i386 libkeyutils1:i386 libjasper1:i386
libavahi-client3:i386 xserver-xorg-video-mach64-dbg libfontconfig1:i386
libgssapi-krb5-2:i386 libavahi-common3:i386 libgpg-error0:i386
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
fglrx-amdcccle
The following NEW packages will be installed:
fglrx fglrx-amdcccle
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/41.8 MB of archives.
After this operation, 130 MB of additional disk space will be used.


. Any thoughts?


More From » video

 Answers
6

Yes, you should definitely use fglrx if you want to maximise the potential of your graphics card. These proprietary drivers provided by AMD itself are the best route to take. There is an active debate over whether or not the open source or the proprietary drivers are better for proprietary cards. You can see a full comparison here, which lists some stats. Ultimately it's your decision, but I recommend the proprietary drivers.


[#39333] Saturday, February 18, 2023, 1 Year  [reply] [flag answer]
Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
itchlos

Total Points: 486
Total Questions: 115
Total Answers: 110

Location: Macau
Member since Fri, Apr 28, 2023
1 Year ago
;