Friday, May 3, 2024
 Popular · Latest · Hot · Upcoming
3
rated 0 times [  3] [ 0]  / answers: 1 / hits: 1335  / 3 Years ago, tue, october 5, 2021, 9:59:54

To keep this question specific and on-topic, let me preface this by stating my intent is not to go into pros and cons of using one type of file manager over another. However, it is clear a significant group of people use console-based file managers, such as Midnight Commander or Ranger. I'd like to know their reasons for doing so.


More From » console

 Answers
4

I'm a Midnight Commander addict, so let me add a few more points:




  • I find dual pane layout to be very efficient for file operations


  • Console keyboard managers are more keyboard-friendly, i.e. it is possible to navigate/select files/perform file operations without using mouse. When working in console, switching to mouse is a hindrance


  • Console keyboard managers are... well, console-friendly, i.e. it is easy to navigate the filesystem and issue commands in console at the same time. Or even assemble commands from file names you see in mc etc.


  • Muscular memory. Midnight Commander's commands are largely the same as Norton Commander used to have ages ago.



[#39470] Thursday, October 7, 2021, 3 Years  [reply] [flag answer]
Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
suspengn

Total Points: 477
Total Questions: 104
Total Answers: 100

Location: Rwanda
Member since Thu, Feb 10, 2022
2 Years ago
suspengn questions
;