Sunday, April 28, 2024
 Popular · Latest · Hot · Upcoming
0
rated 0 times [  0] [ 0]  / answers: 1 / hits: 2953  / 3 Years ago, wed, november 3, 2021, 9:32:10

I have seen that a lot of people are having this same issue. I am running a Lenovo V570 i5 4 core, 6 gigs of ram, and am running 11.10 Onieric Ocelot.



On my system monitor graph it shows CPU at 20%, when I open the monitor it shows core #1 at around 90%, the other cores fluctuate at or below 5-12% if even. Now this seems like a really terrible balance of power between the cores, especially with so much stress on one core only, when these things are designed to work with 4 cores and not at such high temps. My current readings say 64 degrees Celsius, this does not seem normal for any cpu, and I am seriously considering, working on my windows7 partition until I see a real solution to this issue or upgrading to 12.04 right away when it comes out... I have seen countless things saying it has something to do with the Kernel, the kernel on mine is the same as when I upgraded, I really do not like messing with it, as when I had 11.04, I did tinker with it due to the freeze issues I was having, and that just made worse issues. I like this version 11.10 and would like to keep it for a while, but without the fear that my core is going to fry! So any help would be much appreciated! I did try changing a couple things in ACPI, and restarting this did not help, and here I am. I tried one thing prior to that that was listed under a different computer brand, but it would not do a make on the file.



I really need help with this, I rely on this computer for a lot of things, and love this OS! Please help so I do not need to resort to my Microsoft partition! PLEASE!



Here is the fwts cpufrequ- output:



rabbit@rabbit-Lenovo-V570:~$ sudo fwts cpufreq - 
00001 fwts Results generated by fwts: Version V0.23.25 (Thu Oct 6 15
00002 fwts :12:31 BST 2011).
00003 fwts
00004 fwts Some of this work - Copyright (c) 1999 - 2010, Intel Corp.
00005 fwts All rights reserved.
00006 fwts Some of this work - Copyright (c) 2010 - 2011, Canonical.
00007 fwts
00008 fwts This test run on 02/04/12 at 17:23:22 on host Linux
00009 fwts rabbit-Lenovo-V570 3.0.0-17-generic-pae #30-Ubuntu SMP Thu
00010 fwts Mar 8 17:53:35 UTC 2012 i686.
00011 fwts
00012 fwts Running tests: cpufreq.

00014 cpufreq CPU frequency scaling tests (takes ~1-2 mins).
00015 cpufreq ---------------------------------------------------------
00016 cpufreq Test 1 of 1: CPU P-State Checks.
00017 cpufreq For each processor in the system, this test steps through
00018 cpufreq the various frequency states (P-states) that the BIOS
00019 cpufreq advertises for the processor. For each processor/frequency
00020 cpufreq combination, a quick performance value is measured. The
00021 cpufreq test then validates that:
00022 cpufreq 1) Each processor has the same number of frequency states
00023 cpufreq 2) Higher advertised frequencies have a higher performance
00024 cpufreq 3) No duplicate frequency values are reported by the BIOS
00025 cpufreq 4) Is BIOS wrongly doing Sw_All P-state coordination across cores
00026 cpufreq 5) Is BIOS wrongly doing Sw_Any P-state coordination across cores
00027 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00028 cpufreq -----------+---------
00029 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 100.0 %
00030 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 83.7 %
00031 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 69.2 %
00032 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 62.5 %
00033 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 55.2 %
00034 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 48.6 %
00035 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 41.8 %
00036 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 34.5 %
00037 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 27.6 %
00038 cpufreq 9 CPU frequency steps supported
00039 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00040 cpufreq -----------+---------
00041 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 97.7 %
00042 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 83.7 %
00043 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 69.6 %
00044 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 63.3 %
00045 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 55.7 %
00046 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 48.7 %
00047 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 41.7 %
00048 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 34.5 %
00049 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 27.5 %
00050 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00051 cpufreq -----------+---------
00052 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 97.7 %
00053 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 84.4 %
00054 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 69.6 %
00055 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 62.6 %
00056 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 55.9 %
00057 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 48.7 %
00058 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 41.7 %
00059 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 34.7 %
00060 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 27.8 %
00061 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00062 cpufreq -----------+---------
00063 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 100.0 %
00064 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 82.6 %
00065 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 67.8 %
00066 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 61.4 %
00067 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 54.9 %
00068 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 48.3 %
00069 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 41.1 %
00070 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 34.3 %
00071 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 27.4 %
00072 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00073 cpufreq -----------+---------
00074 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 96.2 %
00075 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 82.5 %
00076 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 69.3 %
00077 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 62.7 %
00078 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 55.0 %
00079 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 47.4 %
00080 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 41.1 %
00081 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 34.0 %
00082 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 27.2 %
00083 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00084 cpufreq -----------+---------
00085 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 96.5 %
00086 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 83.6 %
00087 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 68.1 %
00088 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 61.7 %
00089 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 54.9 %
00090 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 48.0 %
00091 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 41.1 %
00092 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 34.2 %
00093 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 27.8 %
00094 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00095 cpufreq -----------+---------
00096 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 96.4 %
00097 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 82.6 %
00098 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 68.8 %
00099 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 60.5 %
00100 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 52.4 %
00101 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 48.8 %
00102 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 41.1 %
00103 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 34.2 %
00104 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 26.4 %
00105 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00106 cpufreq -----------+---------
00107 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 95.3 %
00108 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 82.5 %
00109 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 65.5 %
00110 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 62.8 %
00111 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 54.8 %
00112 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 48.0 %
00113 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 41.2 %
00114 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 34.2 %
00115 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 27.3 %
00116 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00117 cpufreq -----------+---------
00118 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 96.3 %
00119 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 83.4 %
00120 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 68.3 %
00121 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 61.9 %
00122 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 54.9 %
00123 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 48.0 %
00124 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 41.1 %
00125 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 34.2 %
00126 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 27.3 %
00127 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00128 cpufreq -----------+---------
00129 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 100.0 %
00130 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 77.9 %
00131 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 64.6 %
00132 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 54.0 %
00133 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 51.7 %
00134 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 45.2 %
00135 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 39.0 %
00136 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 33.1 %
00137 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 25.5 %
00138 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00139 cpufreq -----------+---------
00140 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 93.4 %
00141 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 75.7 %
00142 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 64.5 %
00143 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 59.1 %
00144 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 51.4 %
00145 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 45.9 %
00146 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 39.3 %
00147 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 32.7 %
00148 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 25.8 %
00149 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00150 cpufreq -----------+---------
00151 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 92.1 %
00152 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 78.1 %
00153 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 65.7 %
00154 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 58.6 %
00155 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 52.5 %
00156 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 45.7 %
00157 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 39.3 %
00158 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 32.7 %
00159 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 24.3 %
00160 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00161 cpufreq -----------+---------
00162 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 88.9 %
00163 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 79.8 %
00164 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 58.4 %
00165 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 52.6 %
00166 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 46.9 %
00167 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 41.0 %
00168 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 35.1 %
00169 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 29.1 %
00170 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 22.9 %
00171 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00172 cpufreq -----------+---------
00173 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 92.8 %
00174 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 80.1 %
00175 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 66.2 %
00176 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 59.5 %
00177 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 52.9 %
00178 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 46.2 %
00179 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 39.5 %
00180 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 32.9 %
00181 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 26.3 %
00182 cpufreq Frequency | Speed
00183 cpufreq -----------+---------
00184 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 92.9 %
00185 cpufreq 2.45 Ghz | 79.5 %
00186 cpufreq 2.05 Ghz | 66.2 %
00187 cpufreq 1.85 Ghz | 59.6 %
00188 cpufreq 1.65 Ghz | 52.9 %
00189 cpufreq 1400 Mhz | 46.7 %
00190 cpufreq 1200 Mhz | 39.6 %
00191 cpufreq 1000 Mhz | 32.9 %
00192 cpufreq 800 Mhz | 26.3 %
00193 cpufreq FAILED [MEDIUM] CPUFreqCPUsSetToSW_ANY: Test 1, Processors
00194 cpufreq are set to SW_ANY.
00195 cpufreq FAILED [MEDIUM] CPUFreqSW_ANY: Test 1, Firmware not
00196 cpufreq implementing hardware coordination cleanly. Firmware using
00197 cpufreq SW_ANY instead?.
00198 cpufreq
00199 cpufreq =========================================================
00200 cpufreq 0 passed, 2 failed, 0 warnings, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0
00201 cpufreq info only.
00202 cpufreq =========================================================

00204 summary
00205 summary 0 passed, 2 failed, 0 warnings, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0
00206 summary info only.
00207 summary
00208 summary Test Failure Summary
00209 summary ====================
00210 summary
00211 summary Critical failures: NONE
00212 summary
00213 summary High failures: NONE
00214 summary
00215 summary Medium failures: 2
00216 summary cpufreq test, at 1 log line: 193
00217 summary "Processors are set to SW_ANY."
00218 summary cpufreq test, at 1 log line: 195
00219 summary "Firmware not implementing hardware coordination cleanly. Firmware using SW_ANY instead?."
00220 summary
00221 summary Low failures: NONE
00222 summary
00223 summary Other failures: NONE
00224 summary
00225 summary Test |Pass |Fail |Abort|Warn |Skip |Info |
00226 summary ---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
00227 summary cpufreq | | 2| | | | |
00228 summary ---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
00229 summary Total: | 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0|
00230 summary ---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
rabbit@rabbit-Lenovo-V570:~$

More From » 11.10

 Answers
2

Well the problem did return the next day or two and as I originally suspected it was cairo dock, the cpu/ram monitor was causing the cpu to go under heavy load. As soon as I disabled it the load was almost down to 1% , but when I tested it by running different programs, there was hardly any air blowing out and no heat. When I periodically check it by opening the system monitor the only cpu readings I get are from running system monitor. Also another thing I noticed the ram was not being used up as much, the percentage before was like 80% +. Now it is a fraction of that! I think updating the BIOS was a good idea as that did help, but the real problem was that applet that I was running. I did check all the different applets and narrowed it down to that one. So for anyone else running Cairo Dock beware of that applet.


[#39509] Friday, November 5, 2021, 3 Years  [reply] [flag answer]
Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
arsleyeuth

Total Points: 72
Total Questions: 121
Total Answers: 112

Location: North Korea
Member since Mon, Oct 31, 2022
2 Years ago
;