Monday, April 29, 2024
 Popular · Latest · Hot · Upcoming
7
rated 0 times [  7] [ 0]  / answers: 1 / hits: 2171  / 1 Year ago, thu, january 19, 2023, 5:45:56

if I'm backing up to an external drive, is there any reason to not use FAT other then FAT's file size/naming issues? It would be nice to be able to access the content on windows/mac but i'm not sure if there's any reason i have to use ext4 to backup with ubuntu files. This is really only for documents/photos/videos I have on the system.


More From » backup

 Answers
5

Generally this can be done but there are some disadvantages:




  • there's a filesize limit (4GB)

  • you can't store any special file attributes like owner, permissions etc (this shouldn't be a problem for documents and videos though)

  • some sync tools like rsync don't work well when they can't check or set some of the files' attributes

  • old filesystems like FAT are more prone to fragmentation and file corruption



As an alternative you can install an ext3 driver on Mac/Windows or use NTFS (which doesn't suffer from problems number 1 and 4).


[#43197] Thursday, January 19, 2023, 1 Year  [reply] [flag answer]
Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
rialhirt

Total Points: 422
Total Questions: 113
Total Answers: 120

Location: France
Member since Sun, May 15, 2022
2 Years ago
rialhirt questions
Mon, May 24, 21, 18:24, 3 Years ago
Tue, May 10, 22, 21:43, 2 Years ago
Thu, Feb 16, 23, 16:32, 1 Year ago
Mon, Jun 13, 22, 03:02, 2 Years ago
;