Saturday, May 4, 2024
 Popular · Latest · Hot · Upcoming
0
rated 0 times [  0] [ 0]  / answers: 1 / hits: 379  / 2 Years ago, mon, october 17, 2022, 1:56:44

The oddest DNS problem that I have seen.


Situation:

On my prod server, all my domains work correctly when they have self-signed SSL certificates. On my local machine all of my domains on the prod server correctly display in my web browsers at:
https://example.com (after I accept the browser warning about self signed ssl certificates)


Problem:

Immediately following successfully attaining a Let's Encrypt SSL for any of my domains on the prod server, results in all of my local web browsers being unable to load https://example.com. However, (the weird part) https://www.example.com works perfectly correctly.


Testing:

1.) I booted into my Windows 10 partition and confirmed that both https://example.com and https://www.example.com both load correctly in any web browser.


2.) A friend on his home network, confirmed that https://example.com and https://www.example.com both load in his local browsers without any problems.


Only in ubuntu 20.04 on my local machine will https://example.com refuse to load in any web browser after the LE SSL has been attained.


Unique Aspect:


The only thing that is unique about my Ubuntu 20.04 set-up is that I run a vbox test server and use dnsmasq for local DNS resolution (which may be irrelevant info). Minus all the extra stuff my /etc/dnsmasq.conf settings are:


port=53
bogus-priv
listen-address=127.0.0.1,192.168.58.1
bind-interfaces
expand-hosts
domain=example-site.test

I also run a wireguard server of the remote server / wireguard client on local machine (however this problem persists regardless of whether I am connected to wireguard or not)


if I use $nslookup prod-server-domain.com it correctly shows me:


nslookup prod-server-domain.org
Server: 192.xxx.xx.xx <--- wireguard server ip
Address: 192.xxx.xx.xx#53 <--- wireguard server ip

Name: prod-server-domain.org
Address: xxx.xx.xxx.xxx <--- public prod server ip

Simplified Even More:

Following the successful attainment of LE SSL certificates for my remote server's domain names, on every web browser in the the world -except- my local ubuntu web browsers the urls https://example.com and https://www.example.com both work correctly as expected leading to the exact same website.


Only in my ubuntu installation does https://example.com FAIL


Whereas https://www.example.com WORKS.


When I open https://example.com and https://www.example.com in web browsers on my Windows partition on the same home network, with the same ip adddress, both https://example.com and https://www.example.com both work correctly.


Additional Info:



  1. The domains all point at the correct IP address



  2. I have the same problem if I completely deactivate UFW and Wireguard



  3. The SSL is being attained via Virtualmin, which confirms the correct url submissions for LE SSL assignment:


    enter image description here


    (all say example.org)


    enter image description here




Firefox and all other browsers show this error for https://example.org
enter image description here
Whereas this works perfectly in all browsers:
enter image description here


user@machine:~$ curl example.org
curl: (7) Failed to connect to example.org port 80: No route to host
user@machine:~$ curl https://example.org
curl: (7) Failed to connect to example.org port 443: No route to host
user@machine:~$ curl https://www.example.org
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Virtualmin</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">

Per request:


$ ip route list
default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 proto dhcp metric 100
default via 192.168.0.1 dev wlp0s20f3 proto dhcp metric 600
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
172.17.0.0/16 dev docker0 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.0.1 linkdown
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.13 metric 100
192.168.0.0/24 dev wlp0s20f3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.18 metric 600

More From » networking

 Answers
5

I finally figured this out.


I use dnsmasq and my external DNS server had stopped working.


I chose new external DNS servers and now all is well.


[#665] Wednesday, October 19, 2022, 2 Years  [reply] [flag answer]
Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
diffeah

Total Points: 78
Total Questions: 130
Total Answers: 98

Location: Peru
Member since Fri, Oct 14, 2022
2 Years ago
diffeah questions
;